RETURN TO LIFE: A CASE OF THE LAZARUS PHENOMENON

SESSION TITLE: Shock and Sepsis in the ICU Case Posters SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: The Lazarus Phenomenon, also known as auto-resuscitation, is a rare event where cessation of CPR results in a delayed return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The phenomenon was named after the story of Lazarus, who was restored to life four days after death. We present a case of a 78-year-old male who presented to the hospital for septic shock and had intra-hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC after cessation of CPR. CASE PRESENTATION: 78 year old male with a medical history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stage IIIA NSCLC and COPD, presented for progressive dyspnea. He complains of feeling weak with loss of appetite and had a recent mechanical fall. Initial vital signs were temperature 96F, BP 141/78, HR 75 bpm, RR 18/min, SaO2 100% on 2LNC. Initial labs showed lactic acid 11.6, BUN 55, creatinine 3.7, CO2 9, anion gap 25, AST 2654, ALT 2120, ALP 159, total bilirubin 0.8, troponin <0.1, CK 399, INR 4.2, PTT 36, WBC 16.5, Hb 10.8, and plt 202. COVID-19 testing was negative. CXR demonstrated a retro-cardiac opacity consistent with previous diagnosis of lung cancer versus a dense consolidation. He was started on antibiotics for sepsis and admitted to the ICU for his metabolic status and shock liver. He remained hemodynamically stable for a few hours until a he had sudden onset of unresponsiveness with asystole. Code blue was called. Repeat labs demonstrated lactic acid 15.5, potassium 6.3, CO2 9. He underwent resuscitation for 32 minutes when compressions were stopped. Within 5 minutes post arrest, sinus activity was noted on the cardiac monitor. The patient had a radial pulse on evaluation. Manual blood pressure measurement was 119/71 with a HR of 99. Arterial blood gas after ROSC showed a pH 7.0, pCO2 68, pO2 273, HCO3 16, lactic acid 19. A few hours later, the patient rapidly de-compensated and underwent resuscitation for a second time. Efforts were deemed futile and the patient expired. DISCUSSION: The physiologic description of the Lazarus phenomenon is yet to be fully elucidated. Hypotheses include auto-PEEP due to rapid manual ventilation generating increased intrathoracic pressure and decreased venous return, delayed drug effect and stunned myocardium during active chest compressions (1). Once chest compressions and positive pressure ventilation via manual bag-mask stops, sudden decrease in intrathoracic pressure allows for sudden venous return and re-perfusion of cardiac tissue, resulting in ROSC in some cases. A recent literature review cited 65 published cases over the past 30 years with the most common rhythm being asystole (2). Most cases of auto-resuscitation occurred between 5-10 minutes post stopping of chest compressions (2). Mortality of these cases were 70% post resuscitation (2). CONCLUSIONS: It is important for clinicians to be aware of the Lazarus phenomenon post resuscitative efforts and to observe patients carefully post resuscitation. Reference #1: Adhiyaman V, Adhiyaman S, Sundaram R. The Lazarus phenomenon. J R Soc Med. 2007;100(12):552-557. doi:10.1177/0141076807100012013 Reference #2: Gordon, L., Pasquier, M., Brugger, H. et al. Autoresuscitation (Lazarus phenomenon) after termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 28, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0685-4 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Vincent Chan No relevant relationships by Mackenzie Kramer No relevant relationships by Nathaniel Rosal No relevant relationships by Laura Walters No relevant relationships by William Ward

Quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during manual facemask ventilation.

Manual facemask ventilation, a core component of elective and emergency airway management, is classified as an aerosol-generating procedure. This designation is based on one epidemiological study suggesting an association between facemask ventilation and transmission during the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2003. There is no direct evidence to indicate whether facemask ventilation is a high-risk procedure for aerosol generation. We conducted aerosol monitoring during routine facemask ventilation and facemask ventilation with an intentionally generated leak in anaesthetised patients. Recordings were made in ultraclean operating theatres and compared against the aerosol generated by tidal breathing and cough manoeuvres. Respiratory aerosol from tidal breathing in 11 patients was reliably detected above the very low background particle concentrations with median [IQR (range)] particle counts of 191 (77-486 [4-1313]) and 2 (1-5 [0-13]) particles.l-1 , respectively, p = 0.002. The median (IQR [range]) aerosol concentration detected during facemask ventilation without a leak (3 (0-9 [0-43]) particles.l-1 ) and with an intentional leak (11 (7-26 [1-62]) particles.l-1 ) was 64-fold (p = 0.001) and 17-fold (p = 0.002) lower than that of tidal breathing, respectively. Median (IQR [range]) peak particle concentration during facemask ventilation both without a leak (60 (0-60 [0-120]) particles.l-1 ) and with a leak (120 (60-180 [60-480]) particles.l-1 ) were 20-fold (p = 0.002) and 10-fold (0.001) lower than a cough (1260 (800-3242 [100-3682]) particles.l-1 ), respectively. This study demonstrates that facemask ventilation, even when performed with an intentional leak, does not generate high levels of bioaerosol. On the basis of this evidence, we argue facemask ventilation should not be considered an aerosol-generating procedure.

Manual bag valve mask ventilation performance among respiratory therapists.

BACKGROUND: High peak pressures delivered via bag valve mask (BVM) can be dangerous for patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine manual ventilation performance among respiratory therapists (RTs) in a simulation model. METHODS: Respiratory therapists (n=98) were instructed to ventilate a manikin for 18 breaths. Linear regression was utilized to determine associated predictors with the outcomes: delivered tidal volume, pressure and flow rate. RESULTS: Among all participants, the mean ventilation parameters include a tidal volume of 599.70 ml, peak pressure of 26.35 cmH2O, and flow rate of 77.20 l/min. Higher confidence values were positively associated with delivered peak pressure (p=0.01) and flow rate (p=0.008). Those with the most confidence in using the BVM actually delivered higher peak pressures and flow rates compared to those with lower confidence levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the urgent need to create an intervention that allows providers to deliver safe and optimal manual ventilation.

Electroconvulsive therapy, personal protective equipment and aerosol generating procedures: a review to guide practice during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the definition of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), identify high-risk AGPs, guidelines to use personal protective equipment (PPE) and review evidence to see if electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a high-risk AGP requiring the use of PPE. METHODS: Existing guidelines and research data were reviewed to answer the questions. RESULTS: There is consensus about the type of anaesthesia used during ECT, what constitutes AGPs and what PPE should be used. It was not clear if ECT was an AGP, but we argue that it is one based on evidence. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ECT is an AGP and that it requires the appropriate use of PPE after taking in to account local supply and demand.